A U.S. District Judge has refused to grant an immediate injunction against Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), allowing them to continue accessing federal data and carrying out mass layoffs despite legal pushback from multiple states.

The lawsuit, spearheaded by attorneys general from states including New Mexico, Michigan, and Arizona, questions the legitimacy of Musk’s authority within the federal government.

Plaintiffs argue that DOGE, a cost-cutting initiative under Musk’s direction, is bypassing constitutional procedures by wielding unchecked power over federal employment and data systems.

They contend that his ability to terminate workers and access sensitive information jeopardizes state-run programs and undermines legal oversight.

READ ALSO: Trump Fires USAID Inspector General Amid Oversight Concerns

Judge Tanya Chutkan acknowledged the gravity of these concerns, admitting that the plaintiffs “legitimately call into question what appears to be the unchecked authority of an unelected individual and an entity that was not created by Congress.”

However, she ruled that their request for an immediate restraining order was too broad and speculative, failing to meet the legal standard for emergency intervention.

Since its establishment, DOGE has aggressively downsized federal agencies, causing disruptions and uncertainty across multiple sectors.

While other courts have temporarily halted some of its actions, this ruling grants Musk and DOGE the green light to continue operations for now. The case, however, is far from over, as broader constitutional questions about DOGE’s authority remain unresolved.

Don’t miss out! Get your daily dose of Entertainment news and more straight to your phone. Join Ghana Street Journal Whatsapp channel now!